the HAES® files: Fat Studies in Popular Culture/American Culture

by Health At Every Size® Blog

by Rev. Dr. E-K Daufin

The Popular Culture/American Culture Association is an international, academic organization whose different areas of research and interest cover alphabetically from Academic and Collegiate Culture through World’s Fairs and Expositions, with a lot in between. Popular Culture includes discovering the social impact of media, media support industries, live exhibits and performances. Of special interest to ASDAH members is the PCA/ACA Fat Studies Area.

That area hosted nine different sessions at the 44th annual national conference in Chicago, April 16-19, 2014, where about 30 other scholars and I from across the globe presented on Fat Stigma and Activism, Fitness and Diet Cultures, Fat and Visual Media, among other topics. Here’s a sampling of my interpretation from some of the Fat Studies sessions.

Three Fat Studies scholars and a HAES® oriented business man critiqued Dr. Katariina Kyrölä’s new book The Weight of Images: Affect, Body Image and Fat in the Media. The academic theory-based text explores how the media establish norms and have a corporeal effect on the viewer. As a recovering bulimic, the author also analyzed her own viewing of the images and her struggle working through the images that portrayed fat in a hateful way. Dr. Kyrölä discussed how fat women are alternately desexualized and hypersexualized as was the African American female lead in Eddy Murphy’s fat woman hateful film, Norbit. Doctoral student Amanda Gilliam noted that fatness is also a racial problem and that thinness is a way to access social power, especially for people of color.

Jay Solomon, co-founder of the HAES modeled retail business More of Me to Love or MOMTL, discussed size-friendly policies for health in the workplace. Acknowledging that higher weight people are hired less often, paid and promoted less when they do get hired, he talked about his success in instituting weight neutral guidelines such as no diet talk in the work place because it creates a hostile environment for those whose goal is intuitive eating. He also has voluntary walking meetings and encourages breaks so that employees can get up and move. After some analysis, his business established a separate, pleasant place for employees to eat, to provide an alternative to the non-intuitive eating unconsciously at our desks habit.

Michaela A. Nowell led what was for me a fascinating session on teaching Fat Studies. She discussed three ways one might approach teaching Fat Studies: 1. As healthcentric and showing how fat is disconnected from health, noting that the class isn’t “promoting obesity.” This approach causes some challenges, especially for higher weight teachers, who aren’t medical doctors because students, so immersed in our fataphobic culture, simply may not believe the teacher. 2. Fat Studies as a human rights issue, noting that if only those who meet with certain so-called health standards are allowed to have human rights, anyone who loses those “health” characteristics will be denied the human rights they used to “be entitled to.” Another disadvantage here is that the teacher can’t really explore the notion that health and fat are not mutually exclusive. 3. Her preferred approach is one that focuses on reframing health for the students by: A. Demonstrating health as a political, rather than just a personal issue. Even personal “choices” are influenced by weight stigma. B. Showing that fat is not inherently bad. C. Showing support that fat doesn’t equal unhealthy. D. Postulating that health shouldn’t be moralized. Shaming actually decreases the likelihood that people will be healthy.

In a Fat Activism session, Francis Ray White, with great good humor, presented on the painful additional challenges for fat activist trans people in that, “normative gender is slender.” Thus trans people often see weight loss as a method to move them toward their ultimate body that reflects how they feel inside. Additionally, he discussed the difficulty in accepting his female breasts while longing for a flat chest and toyed with the idea of accepting his breasts as “moobs/man boobs.”

Fat Studies Area Chair Lesleigh Owens did a critical discourse analysis on, “Why do people hate fat folks so much?” We viewed a short documentary on fat as monster/horror. Owens hypothesized that one of the critical motivations regarding the disgust with fatness is the anger in the notion that those who are able to become and/or stay thin through persistent, life-dominating suffering and sacrifice, may be enraged with fat people who the thin sacrificers perceive as not suffering as much as they do. She said that fat bodies “gone wild” so to speak, are perceived in the horror flick sense, vs. as the otherwise thin co-eds baring their breasts’ bawdiness. Under that rage may also be the fear and real terror that should the thin sacrificers let up at all with their suffering, or be unable to continue, all their pain will be for naught and they shall be one of the walking-fat-might-as-well-be/about-to-be-dead zombies.

I presented research on the higher weight and arithmetically difficult multi-layered stigmas African American women face and attempted to debunk the thin and white privileged myth that Black women (sometimes also included are Latinas) have an ethnic “protective factor” from weight stigma. I couched the presentation in a vocal interpretation of the first United States race protest song. It’s about female light skin color privilege in heterosexual coupling – “I’m So Black and Blue.” Despite my research “song and dance,” the thin, White woman presenting immediately after me, early in her presentation declared her unresearched opinion that, “Black culture celebrates fat women,” and motioned in my direction as she said it. I wanted to interrupt her by yelling something such as, “Did you not HEAR MY PRESENTATION?” Instead I politely wrote her a note offering to discuss whether she wanted to talk afterward about the many ways Black culture stigmatizes higher weight Black women. She didn’t. What was more disheartening was that in the question/answer session following the presentation, no one noted what the presenter had done.

Also troubling was a presentation on weight loss dieting purportedly from a HAES perspective. There were also disturbing calls from newcomers and area members with thin children, who want the area to focus more on thin persons’ fear of fat, as well as their suffering of stigma for dating or otherwise supporting fat people. This seems to me to be unacknowledged thin and race privilege discomfort with not being the focus of attention. As one seasoned fat activist who was not at the conference responded when I was brainstorming with her about the problem, “It’s Fat Studies, not Fear of Fat – Studies.” In addition to all the good work going on in our communities, there remains much work to do around White and thin privilege in the HAES and Fat Activism Communities.

I would like to see our community STOP saying there is no or less weight stigma for African American women. I would like when we mention cultures where there is less or no higher weight stigma, we make it clear what specific cultures we ARE talking about or at least that we’re NOT talking about African American or even Latina culture.

Rather than leaving me hanging, feeling embattled and alone in what is for me debilitating, repetitive defense of my life experience and that of thousands of African American/Canadian/Latina women I’ve worked with on weight stigma, I would appreciate if those present who agree with me or believe me SAY SOMETHING TO THAT EFFECT PUBLICLY DURING the discussion. In addition, I would appreciate comfort and reinforcement afterwards publically AND privately.

Let us continue and step up the intersectionality work in all earnest.

pics4newcards308 004Rev. Dr. E-K. Daufin is an educator, social activist performance, fine artist and writer who earns a living as a professor of communication at Alabama State University in Montgomery, Alabama.  Her research and writing specialty is exploring weight stigma in the media and its effects.  Dr. Daufin is a HAES® expert, Spoken Word poet, Reiki Master, belly dancer, EFT Practitioner and consultant.  You can read more about her workshops on  her webpage.

23 Comments to “the HAES® files: Fat Studies in Popular Culture/American Culture”

  1. I’m sorry you found my presentation “troubling,” but you’ve also misrepresented it. I did not present on weight loss from a HAES perspective. I actually never mentioned HAES. I approached “weight loss blog” as a life writing genre that reproduces (harmful) weight loss success narratives, not a set of real-world practices. I suggested that the genre could be manipulated to tell different stories more representative of the lives of fat people. You make no mention of the intersectional analysis I did in my research on authorship in “weight loss blogs” as the domain of white, able, heterosexual, economically privileged women further bolstering “the success story” as a dominant narrative.

    • I’m sorry you feel I misrepresented your presentation. I did say that this was my take/interpretation of selected presentations. I still found your presentation gravely disturbing.

      • In my professional opinion, “fat positive weight loss,” where you are focusing on weight loss rather than it being a side effect of eating intuitively and moving for joy and pleasure, is a contradiction in terms.

  2. Kate B., For those of us who were not there, would you be willing to address the concern that Rev. Dr. E-K Daufin raised?

    • At the conference, I gave a presentation titled, “Beyond Before and After: Toward a Fat-Positive Weight Loss Blog” based on my work with authorship and blogs as literature. My primary field is American English literature and cultural studies. My presentation was part of a larger discussion on diet and fitness cultures, and the other presenter in the group addressed “fitspo” memes and stigma in gym culture (CrossFit in particular). I thought our presentations were well-matched because we both addressed how narratives of success, strength, and morality are reproduced in popular memes and blogs. My primary argument is that the genre of “weight loss blog” has been constructed and reproduced to represent a very specific experience of fat embodiment (as the Before body), and manipulating/disrupting the genre would allow a greater range of experiences to be represented while diffusing the power of the “weight loss success story.” I understand why the term “fat positive weight loss blog” is upsetting, but that anxiety and refusal to critically address “weight loss” as a term expressing a condition of body malleability still puzzles me. I’m not sure where that resistance comes from, especially considering that my co-presenter was praised for a similar presentation on the cultural constructions of, and her personal experiences with, “fitness.” Several people approached me after my presentation, and more than one suggested that dealing with the middle ground between wholesale body acceptance and the inability to speak in fat positive spaces about fitness or weight loss. One person said to me, “Fat positive people engage in weight loss behaviors all the time. We just don’t talk about it.” So there’s a reason the word “toward” appears in the title to this presentation. There’s more work and more thinking and more writing to be done. And, bluntly, I refuse to be silenced because my ideas are unpopular. I’d be happy to continue this conversation over on my blog because that’s not the point of Rev. Dr. Daufin’s post, and I actually did my own reflection a few days before:

      • “And, bluntly, I refuse to be silenced because my ideas are unpopular. I’d be happy to continue this conversation over on my blog because that’s not the point of Rev. Dr. Daufin’s post” Right, so is there a reason why you are continuing to talk about your presentation rather than the concern that she raised in her post?

      • Well, now I’m just confused. Which concern do you mean? There we’re several addressed, and since she didn’t name the authors of the presentations she took issue with, I’m not sure which one you want me me to address.

      • And several apologies for the typos, but not edit function…

  3. Excellent summary. Thank you

    Annrose Guarino PhD, RDN, LDN Associate Professor State Specialist Urban Health, Food Systems, LSU AgCenter c 225 281 1505 Sent from my iPhone

  4. Hi Kate, My name is Angela and I am researching weight stigma for my PhD. Before I discovered HAES I was also a fat weight-loss blogger. Despite the oxymoronic nature of fat-positive weight loss blog, I think it’s an interesting concept, and I’ll be sure to come to your blog and have a look.

    But I wasn’t at PCA unfortunately. Reading about the presentations has made me really want to be there next year. So just for those of us who weren’t there, did you actually say that weight stigma wasn’t a big problem in certain ethnic communities and Black culture is protective of experiencing stigma for fat women? And if you did, how does this fit in with what EK is suggesting – that although popular cultural images of celebrated large Black bodies suggest a tolerance of fat, the current climate is much different and weight stigma is a big problem for African American women too. This isn’t my direct area of research and I am interested in hearing more about this debate and the evidence for and against.

    Thanks, Ang.

    • I said nothing of the sort. I believe that issue can be attributed to the argument of a different presentation, but since Dr. Rev. Daufin only properly attributed presentations she approved of, I can understand the confusion.

    • No Katie B. did not address the intersectionality issues at all and I do not think my blog says she did. In my professional opinion, “fat positive weight loss” is a contradiction in terms.

    • Whoa — I did NOT say that popular cultural images celebrate large Black bodies. I don’t think they do! It is a White supremist interpretation of popular cultural images that says large Black women’s bodies are “celebrated.” What in my blog made you think that’s what I was saying? It’s not a “debate.” It’s something that SOME White researchers and White audiences have got wrong and about which they need to become educated.

  5. I read the central concern as “In addition to all the good work going on in our communities, there remains much work to do around White and thin privilege in the HAES and Fat Activism Communities” and all the specific examples of problems with content and process that she reports. I know it is a big and daunting topic but I am hoping that our process here can be one where we don’t decenter that concern.

  6. Why is WordPress threading our comments out of order? My “crickets” comment was referring to the silence around the request to center our convo around the intersectionality issues raised by Rev. Dr. E-K Daufin.

  7. OK, I am still wondering if we can address the central concerns here – it seems like we are doing in our commenting the very thing that Rev. Dr. E-K Daufin is noting. I see us failing to track the concerns that are raised about who is the authority on the lived experiences of Black women, about spreading misinformation about the state of body/appearance policing for Black women, and about not speaking up to notice that. Can we as white people take this observation on board or are we going to derail the conversation?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: