Archive for January, 2012

January 31, 2012

the HAES files: the nocebo effect – belief and biology – part III

by healthateverysizeblog

by Jon Robison, Phd, MS

Decades of research on the placebo effect support that people’s perceptions and expectations about their health can positively influence physiological parameters as well as the course and outcome of treatment. But, is the opposite also true? Can negative expectations adversely affect our biology? The answer to this question is yes and the phenomenon is called the nocebo effect.

The word nocebo comes from the Latin nocere (to do harm) and is defined as “the causation of sickness or death by expectations of sickness and death and by associated emotional states.” People most commonly equate the nocebo effect with Voodoo, a concept well-documented in so-called “Traditional Societies” throughout the world. There is, however, substantial scientific evidence that the nocebo effect is alive and well in contemporary Western Cultures.  Here are a few examples from the research over the last 4 decades:

When individuals with asthma were told they were taking a drug that would make their breathing more difficult, airway resistance increased even though the drug was composed simply of saline solution.

People who were susceptible to poison ivy developed rashes when given a harmless look-alike plant and told it was the real thing

25% of people with food allergies developed symptoms when injected with a benign substance and told that it contained the foods to which they were allergic.

The suggestion that a mild electric current was being passed through the head of healthy volunteers caused headaches in about 2/3 of the people in spite of the fact that there was actually no electric current.

 A recent study in the journal Pain clearly demonstrates the power that people’s perceptions can have on their physiology. The authors reviewed 73 clinical trials from 1988 through 2007 involving comparison of the efficacy of 2 different anti-migraine medications (non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, and anticonvulsants) vs. sugar pills (placebos).  Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are known to cause stomach problems. Side effects from anticonvulsants include paresthesia (burning, itching, and numbness) and memory loss. In each study, participants were told they were going to be taking either one of the two drugs or a placebo. In all cases, people who were taking the placebo had side effects that were related to the drugs they thought they might be taking. No one who thought they might be taking an NSAID reported tingling or memory problems, and only people who thought they might be taking NSAIDS reported experiencing stomach problems.

Negative thoughts, feelings and expectations on the part of health care professionals can translate into potentially dangerous and even life threatening consequences for the people they are trying to help. In his excellent book, The Placebo Response, Dr. Howard Brody says that anytime a patient “feels less listened to, without a good explanation, uncared for, and less in control, then we’d predict that a nocebo effect is possible.” He goes on to say: “in our complex and often too impersonal health care system, nocebo effects must be rather common.”

In fact, the literature is replete with stories of individuals who appear to have suffered serious untoward consequences as a result of nocebo effects or what Dr. Andrew Weil refers to as medical “hexing.”  In Spontaneous Healing, Dr Weil relates the story of a woman in her early 40’s who came to see him from Finland after being diagnosed with multiple sclerosis. Although the symptoms to that point had been limited to muscle weakness in one leg, she was depressed and related her story almost without emotion, as if it was all happening to someone else. It turns out that, as can be the case with this type of disease, the initial diagnosis had taken a long time to make and involved many tests. After finally sitting her down in his office and delivering the bad news, her neurologist excused himself and left the room only to return a moment later with a wheelchair that he invited her to sit in to “practice” for when she was totally disabled.

In a study at Massachusetts General Hospital, patients about to undergo surgery were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups that were matched for age, gender, underlying disease, severity of disease and type of operation. Those in the control group were addressed by anesthesiologists in a cursory manner. The anesthesiologist gave them his name and told them that he would be giving them the anesthesia the next day and that everything would be fine. The same anesthesiologists spoke warmly and sympathetically to those in the experimental group, sitting on the bed, holding the patients hand and discussing exactly what they should expect in the way of pain and suffering. The operations were performed the next day by surgeons and nurses who were not aware of which patient belonged to which group. The patients who experienced that simple 5-minute act of compassion needed only half the pain killing medication and were released from the hospital 2.6 days sooner than those in the other group!

Contrary to the traditional dogma of the separation of the mind from the body and of psychology from physiology, the literature on placebo and nocebo clearly demonstrates that thoughts, beliefs and emotions can powerfully affect our physical health. In all therapeutic encounters, treatment is delivered within a psychosocial context based on the expectations of the patient which is strongly influenced by her/his relationship with the involved provider. Every interaction has the potential to detract from or promote the healing process. Furthermore, the beliefs that people hold prior to entering into the therapeutic process can influence the outcome in either direction.

For the work that we do around size acceptance and weight and health, this information has particular significance. It helps us to begin to understand the devastating damage that can result from oppression, weight stigma, discrimination, marginalization, labeling, bullying, etc. even when they are done in the name of health. With the accumulated knowledge of the powerful effects that perceptions and expectations can have on our physiology it is time to realize that it is not only sticks and stones that can hurt us.

January 24, 2012

the HAES files: notes to myself – finding hope in difficult times

by healthateverysizeblog

by Linda Bacon, PhD 

My new year nearly began on a depressing note, because of the way I ended the old one. Right around December 31, I read an article in the Environmental Nutrition newsletter, The Fit vs Fat Debate, written by the dietitian who moderated my September debate with John Foreyt before members of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (formerly American Dietetic Association, or ADA).

This article was hardly the first to bring me down with mindless assertions of conventional thinking on fat, disease and dieting. But as a total misrepresentation of my long-sought ADA platform, it cut particularly deep. It also seemed to undermine my confidence and sense of progress after a year that included many Health at Every Size®(HAESsm) highs, like favorable press, a spirited, community-building ASDAH conference, a successful summer workshop, and the emergence of this blog. If this one article could bring me down, I wondered, how could I find the courage to go forward into 2012 and the years beyond, still pushing against all the odds for a paradigm shift on weight and health?

I know I’m not alone in sometimes wondering how to go on advocating fat-acceptance in a fat-phobic world, so I’m using this first blogpost of the year to share with my HAES homies the resources that pulled me out of the rut. Hopefully, they can help all of us reinforce ourselves and one another when we need to. First, though, some background on the article. 

She Just Didn’t Get It 

The ADA, as you may recall, insisted that HAES belonged on the conference dais only in a debate format, faced by a counter-argument. It was the job of this article’s author, Christine Palumbo, to moderate, and she informed me beforehand that she would be writing a journal article based on the panel. At her request, I suggested numerous HAES resources to support her learning, including my book and the article I co-authored in Nutrition Journal (Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm Shift), as well as a partial transcript of the debate.

So why was none of this information in the article that emerged? How could she have heard so little of the HAES case – missed, in fact, the entire debate aspect of the debate? Her article merely recapitulated conventional thought and either ignored or misinterpreted the HAES perspective. “If you’re overweight or obese,” she wrote, ”There’s no argument that your goal should be to get fit through diet, exercise, and slow, steady weight loss,” Really, Christine? What were you moderating, if not an “argument” about that very point?

 Ms. Palumbo takes as gospel the standard statistical fear-mongering that “two-thirds of Americans are overweight or obese.” (That we even take those numbers seriously astonishes me. Set arbitrary definitions and you can create any fraction you want.) She ignored substantial evidence I presented on the influence of commercial interests that played a role in creating and then benefit from BMI-based definitions. She then parroted unquestioningly the notion that fat leads to death and disease. I mean, even Dr. Foreyt conceded that mortality data show fatter people living at least as long as those in the “normal weight” category. And even he conceded that confounders muddle epidemiologic associations.

 I was even more disturbed– stunned actually – by Ms. Palumbo’s sidebar on HAES, which she labeled an “alternative weight loss approach.” Was she even there at the September debate? How could she have missed the central thesis of every piece of writing I supplied her with? HAES is decidedly not about the pursuit of weight loss. To the contrary, HAES shifts the focus from weight to health. Reducing it to a movement for overweight people was yet another rather egregious missing of the mark.

 To too many in the dietetics community, HAES qua HAES is just too threatening. They want to co-opt it into just another weapon in the anti-obesity arsenal when in reality, HAES exists to disarm their war against obesity.

What We’re Up Against

On reading the article, though, I felt more than ever like a victim of that war. I found myself in a dark place, where I felt disillusioned and hopeless, and my life work suddenly felt meaningless. I had presented Ms. Palumbo with my best stuff. She was, she assured me in an e-mail, “trying her best to capture both points of view.” She seemed, in fact, to be a kind person who wants to do the right thing. Yet, despite all this, all my efforts at education failed even to dent her armor.

For anyone with a HAES perspective and committed to social justice, it’s easy to get discouraged this way because the truth is, this a HAES-hostile world. Our greatest efforts can seem like droplets in an ocean of conventionally accepted thought; especially when our opponents find so much buoyancy in that sea of ideas.

What happened that rendered Ms. Palumbo so unable to consider a new perspective? I don’t know. But I would like to take advantage of this platform to contemplate the challenge we’re up against. Consider a generic woman with her traits: a white, middle-class dietitian in North America, whose BMI places her in the “normal” range.

She lives in a world where her thinness is currency, conferring attention, respect, jobs, and quality health care, among other advantages. She avoids the daily humiliations heaped on fatter people, the looks of disgust, the blame, and the news reports that her shape constitutes a public health crisis. Everything in her training reinforces this posture. It is likely that she was even drawn to her profession because she has absorbed these cultural values more deeply than others and fears becoming fat, herself, and subject to the stigmatization she perpetuates.

She stands to lose a lot by challenging the mainstream paradigm: the self-righteousness and sense of entitlement that many “normal weight” people feel for having “achieved” their weight; the female bonding around food and weight anxieties, the support and respect of the professional community she is invested in, social approval, even her career. Moreover, she would have to reflect on her history and come to terms with the fact that her beliefs and actions, however well-intended, were actually quite hurtful to others.

In light of the tremendous penalty that could come from engaging with the HAES challenge, I expect it isn’t always conscious choice to avoid it. Many of us have strong defense mechanisms that keep us rooted to the safe and familiar and protect us from hearing information that might threaten our identity and worldview.

Letting Go as a Way to Hang On

Putting all this in context made it easier for me to understand why change is coming so slowly despite all my efforts. My next step was to reach out for support from other HAES advocates who I respect tremendously. That they experience similar resistance reminded me that the outcome may have little to do with me and also lifted some of the pressure I was feeling to break through. Given what we’re up against, I need to just do the best I can, I realized, learn from it, and then let go.

My best defense, I remind myself, is to take good care of myself and stay happy, despite the pain and injustice that surround me, and to maintain my strength to carry on. Only by cutting myself a little slack on the results, can I keep up the strength to keep trying. And I have to try because it is only if I stop trying that I give up any chance of winning.

I have never forgotten a conversation with my father in the last months of his life. He reflected on how he had done everything right, obeyed the rules, gone from “rags to riches” and created a lucrative business, created a good marriage, and fathered children who made him proud. His life was “a success” by any conventional measure. Yet why, he wondered, did he feel like a failure?  

It’s a shame that he waited until so late in life to recognize that what matters is feeling pride in who we are, as opposed to placing value solely on our accomplishments. I inherited this to some extent – the constant drive for achievement, never feeling like what I do achieve is enough. (Did I really need three graduate degrees!?!) But that late in life conversation reminded me to think hard about what I need to achieve success. I have achieved the conventional kind of success, involving wealth and standing and prestige (and thinness). But by itself, it leaves me feeling the same emptiness my dad did. 

No. My efforts to make a good life for myself heed my father’s lesson rather than his example. I do what I do – making the case for HAES in the face of almost overwhelming opposition – because it’s the right thing to do, regardless of outcome.

And, finally, I can console myself with the hope that change does happen. Many dietitians are already championing a HAES perspective. HAES did make it to the agenda of the ADA conference. Some dietitians were able to hear the message and are converts or at least opening to a HAES perspective. Mainstream news outlets have been asking if all anti-obesity efforts are such a good thing.

It helps to remember how often we have been astonished by the sudden crumbling of institutions and extraordinary paradigm changes: the American Revolution, the March on Birmingham, the Stonewall riots, Tahrir Square…  And let’s not forget that it is now scientific consensus that the earth is round.

Change happens because ordinary people organize, insist on challenging the system and speaking their truths, and do not give up. So, as hard as it can be to feel I’ve tried and failed, I take comfort knowing at least I’m still trying.

January 17, 2012

the HAES files: weekend warrior syndrome and the national, annual B.S.

by healthateverysizeblog

by Jeanette DePatie (The Fat Chick), MA, ACE

Ahh January.  After the champagne flutes and the ball drop and the confetti, it’s time for the annual Big Shift.   What is the big shift you ask?  Well the Big Shift (or the B.S.) is when the entire country moves from thoughts of spending time with family and spending money and eating big wonderful meals and fabulous homemade treats to thoughts of shame and guilt. Every ad on television features a guy holding out pants that are 10 sizes too big for him or babes in bikinis and high heels glibly promising to create a whole new you.  It’s enough to fuel a full-on fat panic.  And that fat panic can lead to injury.

Fueled by fat panic, many people try to do too much too quickly after the holidays.  They jump right into an exercise program and end up limping right back out with a sports-related injury.  According to the British Osteopathic Association, panic over holiday weight leads to a 20 per cent increase in the number of people visiting their osteopaths for treatment in January. 

But it doesn’t have to be that way.   You can significantly increase your fitness level and still stay safe.  You just have to apply a modicum of common sense and a few simple rules:

1.  Assess your current fitness level.  Ah, the life of the weekend warrior.  You haven’t played softball since you were 10, but how hard can it be, right?  You got a new bike for Christmas and want to take that baby out for a 15-mile ride, except you haven’t done that before, EVER.  Your personal trainer wants you to produce great “results” for his before/after bulletin board so he trains you so hard you can’t get out of bed the next day.  And it’s a surprise that the sports medicine doctor is completely booked at the end of January?   The answer here is just two words: start small.  Think back to the last time you did any sort of exercise.  Was it recent (less than a month ago?)  Did you feel okay afterwards?  If you recently exercised and felt okay afterwards, whatever you did that day was a reasonable starting place for that particular form of exercise.  If you’re trying a new form of exercise, you need to back off even further.  Just because you can walk for 20 minutes, doesn’t mean you can play 20 minutes of squash without getting hurt.

If  you haven’t worked out in a long time (or ever) you need to start very small in a safe place and check in regularly with your body to determine your starting point.  You can get some help from a personal trainer.  Or you can check out my “Rock the Block” exercise as a great way to determine your starting level.

2.  Ramp up Slowly.  If you’re walking 3 miles per week this week, it doesn’t mean that next week you should do 6. According to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, people are more prone to injuries when they increase the intensity and duration of their workouts without building up slowly—something more common in people who want to make up for lost time.  

One of the main reasons for gym injuries is trying to ramp up too quickly—especially in exercises on machines designed to strengthen abdominal and lateral (side) muscles.  This can lead to injuries of the lower back and even cause respiratory problems by straining the muscles in the chest.

You should ramp your overall activity level by no more than 10% per week.  This means you may increase ONE aspect of your workout by 10% per week.  You can increase the distance or duration (distance traveled or number of minutes exercised) the intensity (walking pace, heart rate) OR the frequency (number of workouts per week) by 10% per week. 

A 10% increase doesn’t seem like a lot, but it’s cumulative and it adds up.  After one New Year’s eve resolution, I started walking about 6 miles per week.  By increasing my distance by just 10% per week,  I was able to complete a marathon by the end of the year!  Had I started out much more aggressively I probably would have gotten injured and never finished.  It pays to be the tortoise and not the hare.

3.  Listen to your body.  Your body is a finely tuned instrument.  When it’s not working at an optimal level, it will let you know.  Aches, pains and other symptoms are like your body’s dashboard indicators.  And these indicators are very important.

Most of us, treasure our cars. We wouldn’t think of ignoring a “check engine” light on the dashboard. We wouldn’t continue to try to drive on a flat tire. We wouldn’t drive blithely by with a loud thumping noise under the hood. But how many of us, ignore the signals our bodies give us as we’re trying to exercise? If you’ve ever stretched something too far, or popped something out of place, you’ve probably experienced either severe muscle tension or pain. This pain is the proverbial thumping noise under the hood. If you experience pain, you need to STOP, pull the car over and figure out what the heck is going on. Here are some warning signs you should never ignore as you work out.:

  • Feeling of dizziness or lightheadedness
  • Feeling of tightness or pain in chest, trunk, back or jaw
  • Extreme breathlessness
  • Unusual fatigue
  • Nausea
  • Loss of muscle control
  • Allergic reactions—hives or rash
  • Blurred vision

 

Let me summarize, it’s normal to feel fatigue or a slight ache after exercise.  But generally speaking, if it hurts, don’t do it!

That’s it!  Remember, you don’t have to succumb to the national, annual B.S.  You don’t have to be a weekend warrior.  Just follow those three simple rules and you will be exercising safely and happily through January, past Valentine’s Day and through the entire year.   

January 10, 2012

the HAES files: how to tell if you are getting a diet-in-haes-clothing

by healthateverysizeblog

by Deb Burgard, PhD

Along with the increasing public recognition of the Health at Every Size® model, there is some confusion about what the HAES SMmodel is and is not.  Some discussions of the HAES approach are omitting or distorting aspects that are critical to its practitioners.  There are several renditions of the model’s tenets (listed at the end), but first I would like to offer some critical questions to ask when you see it being discussed in the media. 

If you can answer “yes” to these questions, you may be reading an inaccurate or at least incomplete presentation of the model. 

Does the account you are reading:

Perpetuate the Pursuit of Weight Loss, e.g.:

  • Promise weight loss?
  • Fail to recognize the harms for people of all sizes of the existing interventions for changing weight?
  • Create a new set of “rules” about how to eat?
  • Shame some aspect of our inner selves by trying to “get rid of it, starve it, cut it out, imprison it”?

Perpetuate Healthism, e.g.:

  • Present only fat people who are healthy as “poster children”?
  • Create a class of “Good Fatties” vs. “Bad Fatties”?
  • Collude with the notion that healthier people are morally better?
  • Fail to demand quality medical treatment for fat people with health challenges?
  • Fail to critique the moral corruptness of trying to eliminate health costs by eliminating people with health challenges?

Reduce the model to Individual Choices, leaving out the critique of Weight Stigma, e.g.:

  • Omit any reference to the environmental sources of ill health, especially weight stigma?
  • Fail to propose any policy or institutional solutions to the problem of weight stigma?
  • Propose that individuals solve the problem of institutionalized weight stigma and shaming by losing weight and leaving the stigmatized group?
  • Fail to connect the dots with weight loss efforts of people across the weight spectrum, including people who have disordered eating from the pursuit of weight loss?

Perpetuate the Misclassification of Diversity as Disease, e.g.:

  • Explicitly or implicitly condone the use of BMI categories to classify people?
  • View higher-weight people as “diseased” based solely on weight?
  • Attribute any health problems at higher weights to being at a higher weight, and fail to treat health problems regardless of weight?
  • Overlook the health problems or fail to consider the health status of lower-weight people?
  • Assume that thinner is healthier?

Perpetuate a Short-Term vs. Sustainability Focus, e.g.:

  • Present as a “makeover”?
  • Fail to incorporate the question of what is sustainable for unique individuals?
  • Focus on outcomes rather than the quality of day-to-day life?
  • Reduce the profound idea of body acceptance to the notion of “confidence”?

Perpetuate “Expertism,” e.g.

  • Fail to include the input from members of the community itself, especially members who are trying to change institutionalized weight stigma?
  • Place “expert” knowledge above people’s felt, embodied experience?
  • Propose a specific eating regimen for all people that fails to incorporate the individual’s physical and psychological experience of food and eating?
  • Fail to expose public policy and medical practice to the test of whether they themselves promote weight stigma?
  • Present a “one-size-fits-all” perspective that is closed to update and revision, especially to the lived experiences of the community members?

Perpetuate a War with the Body, e.g.:

  • Place more confidence in the mind’s ability to regulate eating and weight (ie “discipline”) than the body’s?
  • Label normal body processes as diseased?
  • Propose as “cure” the disruption of normal functioning of healthy organs?
  • Fail to appreciate the biological value of having some members of our species be fatter/more fuel-efficient?
  • Prescribe a particular body size that is not attainable through healthy living?

The people who have developed the Health at Every Size model have integrated decades of experimental and epidemiological research and clinical practice, as well as the lessons of many social justice and civil rights movements, to find a path that reconnects us with our bodies, our life purposes, and each other.  We ask that presentations of the HAES® model be as complete and nuanced as possible, and avoid the aforementioned pitfalls and mischaracterizations.

Additional sources of information on the HAES Tenets:

January 5, 2012

the HAES files: georgia on my mind

by healthateverysizeblog

by Deb Lemire, President of the Association for Size Diversity and Health

The Children’s Health Alliance of Atlanta has launched a campaign using short 30 second videos with chubby children talking into the camera sharing their shame and fear of being a fat person. 

Yes Tina, it is hard to be among the one million fat kids in Georgia.  And we agree with Jaden that it’s no fun getting picked on because you’re fat.  But the Strong4Life folks in Georgia decided that instead of building a community that supports healthy behaviors in children of all sizes they have chosen to build a community of stigma. 

Instead of working within their communities to provide access to fresh foods and safe places to play, they choose to encourage a culture of bullying.

Instead of using funds to challenge kids’ imaginations and encourage them to explore and create, they chose to fund fear.

Instead of standing on the side of compassion, they chose to stand on the side of cruelty.

Health comes in all shapes and sizes.  Being physically active and eating nutritious foods will generate health.  Convincing children that they are sick or failures because of their body size will not.

January 3, 2012

the HAES files: new year’s resolution — boot the bully from your brain

by healthateverysizeblog

by Michelle May, MD

Bias. Stereotyping. Prejudice. Discrimination. Bullying.                  

These ugly words describe a serious problem weight stigma. Our culture is entrenched in the belief that fat is bad, people with fat are bad, people who exceed a BMI of 25 are unhealthy, and that only a narrow range of body sizes are beautiful. Billions of dollars are spent trying to attain the cultural ideal, but the more we diet, the further we move from it.

Whether subtle or blatant, weight stigma is broadcast into our living rooms and shows up in our classrooms, break rooms, and exam rooms. For many of us, weight stigma hits even closer to home: right between our ears!

 Making the invisible, visible

 What beliefs about weight have you internalized? Are those beliefs helping you or harming you?

 By internalizing this cultural bias, we condemn ourselves to living within its limitations. We allow the bully to move into our brains.

 I’m not letting the bullies off the hook, but if you believe them, you become them.

 What is the reality you are creating for yourself?

 You can only change what you are aware of. Without awareness, you may repeat old, even painful, patterns simply because they are familiar. In other words, you create your own reality.

For example, you may have old tapes that sound something like this: 

  • I’m too embarrassed to be seen exercising.
  • I can’t go to the gym until I’ve lost some weight.
  • I’m trying to eat healthy but I’m not losing weight—it doesn’t matter what I eat.
  • I’ll get diabetes because I can’t lose weight, so why change the way I eat?
  • I can’t eat what I love in public, so I’ll binge later in private.
  • I’ll never look like I did in high school, so why bother with healthy eating and exercise?
  • I don’t deserve someone who loves me because I’m too fat.
  • I don’t feel sexy because of my weight.
  • I don’t see how my partner can think I’m sexy so I thwart his/her attempts.
  • I don’t believe my husband when he tells me I’m beautiful.
  • I don’t want to go to the doctor because I regained the weight I lost.
  • I don’t take my blood pressure medicine because I know I should lose weight instead.
  • I won’t buy new clothes until I reach my goal weight.
  • If I was thinner, I would ask for that promotion.
  • I’d love to travel but I want to lose weight first.
  • I love to dance but I’m too embarrassed.

Making the impossible, possible

 What if? What if you booted the bully from your brain? Ask yourself, “How could my life be different if I didn’t buy into those limitations?” See how the bullying thoughts above would change if you dropped the stigma. 

  • I’m exercising.
  • I go to the gym.
  • I’m trying to eat healthy.
  • I’m at risk for diabetes so I’m changing the way I eat.
  • I’ll never look like I did in high school. I’m eating healthier and exercising.
  • I eat what I love.
  • I deserve someone who loves me.
  • I feel sexy.
  • My partner thinks I’m sexy.
  • My husband tells me I’m beautiful.
  • I go to the doctor.
  • I take my blood pressure medicine.
  • I buy new clothes.
  • I’m going to ask for that promotion.
  • I love to travel.
  • I love to dance so I do.

Boot the Bully from the Block

 Take your power back. Boot the bully from your brain and embrace the Health at Every Size® paradigm! Then help us boot the bully from the block! To learn more: visit ASDAH’s website.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 739 other followers